Every time I think of Jerry Sandusky, I think of this.
The NCAA has taken the unprecedented step of reducing Penn State's penalties resulting from the condoning and perpetuation of child rape throughout the football department. The reason, and I'm not joking here, is "good behavior." The logical question for every college football fan is, "what exactly constitutes good behavior at Penn State?" How low has the bar actually been set in State College, PA? The administrators that facilitated Jerry Sandusky for all those years still have yet to be brought to justice.
Mark Emmert gave no examples of things for other universities to strive for other than not cheating while on probation. Thanks for the guidance Mark, you hapless buffoon. Somehow you've been able to skip town as scandal is closing in throughout your career, but I hope you can't outrun this one, you ignorant FUCK. Emmert was quoted, ""It should not be seen as a precedent of handling other cases." Hey Mark, the NCAA has already made it vividly clear that 'precedent' will never ever fucking matter. No one - I repeat - no one will ever get anything like USC. Not even a whole team worth of cheaters (Read: Miami) will get punished like USC. It will however be unprecedented how much of a cheap suit you will fold like to Donna Shalala, but astonishingly, a precedent will also not be set for future egregious cheaters (Read: Alabama).
No comments:
Post a Comment